১| ২৬ শে ফেব্রুয়ারি, ২০১৫ রাত ৮:৪৭

মোরশেদুজ্জামান বলেছেন: বর্তমানে মাযহবের বিরুদ্ধে খুব ফেতনা ছড়াচ্ছ

২| ২৬ শে ফেব্রুয়ারি, ২০১৫ রাত ৮:৫১

খেলাঘর বলেছেন:


প্রাচীনকালে মানুষের সামাজিক ধারণা পরিস্কার ছিলো না, তারা মানষকে বিভক্ত করেছে।

এখন মানুষকে কোনভাবে শ্রেণীতে বিভক্তকরণ অপরাধের সামিল।

৩| ২৬ শে ফেব্রুয়ারি, ২০১৫ রাত ১০:০৮

প্রামানিক বলেছেন: ধন্যবাদ চালিয়ে যান।

৪| ২৭ শে ফেব্রুয়ারি, ২০১৫ সকাল ৯:০৯

হানিফঢাকা বলেছেন: Brother, your writing is totally absurd. Tell me one thing clearly, why do we need to follow mazhab when we do have Quran at our hand in its original form? Quran is not a mysterious book not written in elvish form and nor does it have any mysterious hidden meaning that one should not understand. Your points regarding the justification of mazhab can easily be answered each by each with all the explanations. But this is beyond the scope here. What was the mazhab of our prophet (PUBH)? Why we follow guidebook with full of errors while we have authentic free of error main book? From where did such Imam concept came? Did Quran says anything abut it? What Quran says about them?

[009:031] They take their priests and their anchorites to be their lords in derogation of God, and (they take as their Lord) Christ the son of Mary; yet they were commanded to worship but One God: there is no god but He. Praise and glory to Him: (Far is He) from having the partners they associate (with Him).

[009:034] O ye who believe! there are indeed many among the priests and anchorites, who in Falsehood devour the substance of men and hinder (them) from the way of God. And there are those who bury gold and silver and spend it not in the way of God: announce unto them a most grievous penalty-

Now come to the Imams. What did they say to each others? Followings are few examples of your beloved Imams


There were grave disputes between Imams Shafi’i, Abu Hanifa, Malik,
Hanbal and Sufiyan Sauri. Whoever uttered much nonsense was called a
Faqih (enlightened jurist). (Shah Waliullah, Hujjatullah Al Baligha pg 254)

The so-called Imams were all children of bondwomen. They destroyed
Islam just as the children of bondwomen had destroyed the Israelites.
(Safyan Sauri, Khateeb 13:394)

Out of the scores of mutual indictments of the ‘Imams’ , the following few are worthy of a glance in Tareekh Khateeb Baghdadi, Vol 13 pp 390 to 396,pg 498 on, and Vol 14 pg 257 on.

The mischief of Imam Abu Hanifa for the Ummah is no less than that of Dajjal. According to Imam Abdur Rahman Mehdi, his Fitna is greater then that of Dajjal, the anti-Christ. Safyan Thauri and Imam Auzaa’i said, "No one as reprehensible as Abu Hanifa has been born in Islam." Abu Hanifa called Imam Ja’far Sadiq and Imam Malik as the worst of creations.

Imam Shafi’i called Abu Hanifa the worst of creation.

Imam Abu Yousuf declared Imam Abdullah bin Mubarak a great sinner.
Abdullah replied, “Abu Yousuf is a greater sinner and a greater liar.”

Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal said, "I agree with what you are telling me, but if Abu Hanifa supported it, then I reject it as nonsense." Abu Hanifa and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal were "Munkireen" (deniers) of Hadith.

A person told a Hadith on behalf of Imam Malik to Abu Hanifa that wudhu (ablution) is half of faith. Imam Abu Hanifa responded, “You should perform two ablutions so that your faith can become whole. (Khateeb Baghdadi 13:387). This one makes sense.

Abu Hanifa should have been flogged since he accepted only 17 Ahadith. (Khateeb 13:387)

Note: The complete name of the oft-quoted book below, Tahqiq-il-Mazahib, is Gharaib fil Tahqiq-il-Mazahib Wa Tafhimul Masaail. Abu Hanifa declared that Imam Malik was a man without any sense. (Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)

Imam Ja’afar Sadiq was an ugly blot on Islam according to Ahmad bin Hanbal. (Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)

Imam Naafe’ said, “Imam Shafi’i committed the most grievous crime, calling Hadith as another form of revelation. He equated Hadith with Wahi. (Tahqiq-il-Mazahib). This one is quite right.

Imam Shafi’i and Imam Malik were sodomites and catamites.” A Mullah at large from Deoband (“Maulana” Yousuf Islahi), these days begins his address by declaring Imam Shafi’i as his hero. Imam Shafi’I, being a great forger, is totally unreliable. (Imam Yahya Bin Moin in Jama’ Bayanul ‘Ilm)

Abu Hanifa had no trace of the knowledge of Deen. (Imam Ahmad Bin
Hanbal, Khateeb Baghdadi 13:396)


Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal was apparently a vanguard of Islam, but in truth, he was a dangerous hypocrite. Mujahid-al-Munafiq Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal, by Abdul Muhsin bin Mullah Ali Al-Qari, pg 67-135) Abu Hanifa is no less than Iblees and Dajjal. (Imam Malik, Khateeb Baghdadi 13:396)

The worst of all people in Islam is Abu Hanifa. He is Dajjal. (Abdur Rahman
Bin Mahdi, Imam Ozaa’i, Khateeb Baghdadi 13:498)

Imam Yahya bin Moin said that Iman Hanbal was a hidden Sabai (a bitter, hateful Shi’a). (Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)


The Sacred Tank of water, Intercession, Angels questioning in the grave, Doom of the grave, Returning of souls in the grave, are truths beyond doubt. But Imam Bukhari said, “If Hanbal says that, it is all nonsense.” (Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)

Abu Hanifa says, “Be the curse of Allah on those who call themselves Imams… Imam Malik, Shafi’i and Ja’far Sadiq were deceitful liars and sodomites. (Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)

Abu Hanifa said that the ‘Imams’ of Islam are worse than the crawling creatures. (Durre-Mukhtar)

Imam Ja’far Sadiq himself was a master forger, but he called all Imams of Figh and the hadith narrators as the worst creatures under the heavens.
(Tahqiq-il-Mazahib)

Imam Abu Yusuf said that other Imams were insects compared to Imam Abu Hanifa. (Fatawa Alamgiri)

Since the so called Imam did not have and showed any respect to others, how come we show respect them? Their saying can explain why people from one mazhab cannot tolerate others. The root lies in their speech.